https://stopelonfromfailingagain.com outlines why Elon Musk is a “Scam Artist”
EVERY SINGLE TESLA OWNER IN THE WORLD is Having a Message Placed on Their Windshield:
From Today’s News On Time Magazine’s, The Drive:
“Somebody really has it in for lithium-ion batteries—and Tesla battery packs in particular. A Tesla Model S driver returning from a hike found a letter on his vehicle’s windshield that assailed the battery technology, the venture capitalists that fund their development, and Tesla.
The letter, which was posted on the Tesla Motors Club forum, is written in a heavily sarcastic style and opens by pooh-poohing Tesla owners, asking if they are tired of being called “sheep” and “misogynistic Silicon Valley Clone.” It continues with attacks on Elon Musk, who is alleged by the writer to be a revenge-seeking financier of President Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton holed up in Alphabet CEO Eric Schmidt’s “sex penthouse.”
But the real villain in this letter is evil lithium-ion battery technology.
Lithium-ion batteries are used in nearly all electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles, including the Nissan Leaf, Kia Soul EV, and Ford Focus EV. They’re also what makes laptops and smartphones last the entire day (ok, 6 hours). But to the typed letter’s author, they’re mobile death traps that will explode spontaneously at any minute, endangering the lives of the entire world.
The writer points out instances where lithium-ion batteries resulted in fires, including high-profile Tesla accidents and Boeing 787 Dreamliners being grounded for fire risks. But for some reason, only Tesla and Fisker vehicles were mentioned in the article. Samsung, LG, Nissan, Sony, and many others companies manufacture lithium-ion batteries, so why are they let off the hook while Tesla and Elon Musk are singled out? Is it a Trump-fueled protest against the Silicon Valley elite? Or is it part of the anti-Elon campaign?
------------------------
‘Dear Fellow Tesla Driver:
We saw that you own this Tesla. Are you getting tired of having passers-by yell: “Tone Deaf Douchebag”, “Tesla Tool!”, “Arrogant Prick”, “Ostentatious Obama Oaf”, “Sheep”, “Mindless Yuppie Scum”, “Misogynistic Silicon Valley Clone”, or other bad things?
Well suck it up, Buttercup! Let us share some tips on how to defeat those who do not acknowledge the social superiority of us Tesla owners!
Here are the tips to blow those Alt-Right Trump lovers out of their socks:
1.
Know that Elon Musk is one of the main financiers behind Barack
Obama
and Hillary Clinton. It may look like Clinton and Obama were blown
out of politics by most of America but Musk, Clinton and Obama are
going to get together at Eric Schmidt’s sex penthouse and plot
some
really serious payback.
2.
When you hear stuff like this about the Tesla batteries: “Lithium
ion batteries are blowing up, starting fires and, generally,
destroying people’s homes, cars, electronics and physical health.
Boeing was just ordered to stop flying the 787 Dreamliner because
it's Lithium ion batteries are catching fire spontaneously. A
group
of silicon valley venture capitalists forced/leveraged the
government
to buy and pay for these specific batteries, that they have stock
in,
in order to benefit their profit margins. Other batteries don’t
have these problems. They knew about this from day one but put
greed
ahead of safety. There are thousands and thousands of reports of
spontaneous lithium ion fires but the VC's who back lithium ion
pay
to keep this information hushed up. Millions of these batteries
have
been recalled for fire risk. The VC's tried to push as many as
they
could before they got caught. Now they are caught. These VC's own
stock in lithium mining companies too.”
Just
ignore it.
3.
Tesla Motors has filed a patent which states the following , THESE
ARE TESLA MOTORS WORDS warning about a crisis, the level of which
they never disclosed to the consumer: “Thermal runaway is of major
concern since a single incident can lead to significant property
damage and, in some circumstances, bodily harm or loss of life.
When
a battery undergoes thermal runaway, it typically emits a large
quantity of smoke, jets of flaming liquid electrolyte, and
sufficient
heat to lead to the combustion and destruction of materials in
close
proximity to the cell. If the cell undergoing thermal runaway is
surrounded by one or more additional cells as is typical in a
battery
pack, then a single thermal runaway event can quickly lead to the
thermal runaway of multiple cells which, in turn, can lead to much
more extensive collateral damage. Regardless of whether a single
cell
or multiple cells are undergoing this phenomenon, if the initial
fire
is not extinguished immediately, subsequent fires may be caused
that
dramatically expand the degree of property damage. For example,
the
thermal runaway of a battery within an unattended laptop will
likely
result in not only the destruction of the laptop, but also at
least
partial destruction of its surroundings, e.g., home, office, car,
laboratory, etc. If the laptop is on-board an aircraft, for
example
within the cargo hold or a luggage compartment, the ensuing smoke
and
fire may lead to an emergency landing or, under more dire
conditions,
a crash landing. Similarly, the thermal runaway of one or more
batteries within the battery pack of a hybrid or electric vehicle
may
destroy not only the car, but may lead to a car wreck if the car
is
being driven or the destruction of its surroundings if the car is
parked”. That is not as bad a terrorists, though, right?
4.
Tesla's own staff have now admitted that once a lithium ion fire
gets
started in one of their cars, it is almost impossible to
extinguish
burning lithium ion material. This is Telsa’s own words in THEIR
patent filing, (You can look it up online) saying that the risk is
monumental. Tesla has 6800 lithium ion batteries, any one of which
can “go thermal” and start a chain reaction! If you look at all
of the referenced YOUTUBE movies you will see how easy it is to
set
these things into danger mode. Imagine a car crash with a Tesla
where
these 6800 batteries get slammed all over and then exposed to
rain,
fire hose water, water on the roads, cooling system liquid.. OMG!!
And then if, in that same accident the other car is a gasoline car
getting burned alive sounds BAD! Telsa is covering up the problems
with its batteries BUT they are doing it to protect Democrat
billionaires so that is OK!
5.
Lithium Ion batteries “go thermal” in peoples pockets, in your
notebook, especially in your Tesla and Fisker car and everywhere
else. There are thousands and thousands of articles documenting
this
and there is a cover-up by the VC’s that fund these things to keep
this fact out-of-sight.Making Lithium Ion batteries poisons the
workers who make them. It is a dangerous product. People want to
outlaw lithium ion batteries. Don’t let them outlaw our lovely
lithium ion batteries or Elon Musk will go broke and not be able
to
buy any more Rent Boys or cool toys for his boyfriend Larry Page
at
Google. Getting burned alive by the thermite-bomb-like Tesla
battery
back is a REALLY Exciting way to go!
6. While it is true that Tesla only exists thanks to Elon Musk’s briberies and that lithium ion batteries blow up when they get: wet, hot, bumped, over-charged, struck by energy fields, exposed to air or squashed; and that they poison the Earth and that they poison and kill the workers that make them; and that they come from Afghan and Bolivian war corruption.. It is also true that we Tesla drivers are mindless yuppies who never read the real news, exist in a tech bubble and spend every moment looking at our Zuckerberg-manipulated Facebook feeds so we DON’T FUCKIN’ CARE! YAHOOOOOO!
MarkG/teslamotorsclub.com
Elon Musk has been the subject of fake news articles and a negative campaign spearheaded by a conservative political group Citizens for the Republic (CFTR), whose board members have ties to energy companies. The organization is angling to end government subsidies for clean energy companies such as Solar City which recently merged with Tesla. Silicon Valley seems the wrong place to wage war against the CEO most admired by start-up founders…”
HA! The egotistical Musk bought and paid for all of the awards he got in order to self-promote his massive ego. Here are the facts from the law enforcement site at http://www.globalscoop.net ; Elon Musk refuses to answer the following questions:
Recently; Numerous ex-Tesla staff and contractors, former suppliers, federal investigators, investigative reporters, investors and ex-partners of Tesla Motors have provided facts about Tesla Motors which are disturbing to the public, Congress, and the market. Please provide clarification of the following charges and concerns in order to resolve outstanding issues between the public and Tesla Motors –
– Are Tesla and Google, essentially, the same entity by virtue of the same investors, agenda and stock market manipulations?
– When damaging news about Tesla emerges, do Tesla and Google investors place multiple stock-buy orders from a multi-billion dollar slush fund in order to make it appear that individual outside investors are excited by Tesla when, in fact, it is only a small internal group of investors “pumping themarket”? Does Google “bury” any negative stories about Tesla in their searches on orders from Tesla/Google investors? Is that a violation of securities laws?
– It is said that the Tesla Model S has the most surveillance
devices to watch, track, listen-to and broadcast the activities of
the occupants, built into it than any other car in the world. Elon
Musk has personally told reporters that hiscars constantly watch the
driver and occupants. Why is that? Why are Tesla and Google obsessed
with spying on the public?
– In multiple recorded
interviews, Elon Musk is on public record telling the news media
that, after careful research, the NUMMI plant in Fremont California
would be a very bad choice for Tesla? Why did that suddenly change?
What participation did Senator Dianne Feinstein and her husband’s
real estate Company CBRE have on that decision and the award of the
loan to Tesla? Why do Senator Feinsteins staff now work for Tesla?
Why didGlenn Greenwald call Feinstein’s actions “suspicious”?
What political support or funding did Tesla or Google provide to any
related political officials?
– From 2008 to 2010
numerous competing electric car companies have charged that Tesla
Motors placed Tesla Motors “moles” inside of their companies to
intelligence-gather and cause disruption. Is that true?
–
Google and Tesla motors share the same venture capital investor
groups and alliances. Numerous expert at Tech-Crunch, Valleywag and
other industry journals have published articles about the fact that
those VC’s actively collude with each other to lock competing
technologies and companies out of the market and create business
monopolies. Did Tesla investors and associates participate in such
activities? If so, would that not be a violation of SEC laws?
–
Did Tesla and/or Google reward certain politicians with campaign
funding, web promotion, revolving door jobs for staff, and other
incentives, in exchange for “hot-tracking” State and Federal
taxpayer money for Tesla Motors?
– While other companies
built consumer priced electric cars before and during Tesla’s
existence, why did Tesla choose to build an unaffordable car and
position the marketing of it to “the 1%” when the money for that
car came from the 99% taxpayers?
– Numerous cities were
told that they would have the Tesla car factory and then they stated,
or sued Tesla, saying Tesla acted “in bad faith” and “used
false and misleading information” to induce them to provide
assurances which were used to pump the stock market. Why did Tesla
lead so many cities on?
– The factory that builds your
batteries and the U.S. Government states, in their formal technical
documents, that when Tesla batteries are on fire they emit
lethal, brain-damaging, carcinogenic, liver, lung and DNA damaging
fumes and smoke. Why do you not inform the public of this danger in
your literature?
– Lithium ion production kills and
terminally sickens workers overseas. Multiple Tesla workers have been
burned alive at your factory. OSHA has launched an investigation.
What have you done to prevent the accidental and long term
injuries to your staff and contractors?
– Bernard Tse,
and other main Tesla Engineering staff including: electric engineer
Doug Bourn, electrical engineer Andrew Ingram, Brian M. Finn, senior
manager of interactive electronics and George Blankenship; while
investigating battery purchases for Tesla Motors, received numerous
white-papers and technical documents from LG Chem, Panasonic and the
U.S. D.O.E and vast numbers of other battery-makers which
specifically stated that lithium-ion batteries would be “stressed”
and “likely to combust” when used in the configuration which
Tesla intended. They stated that the batteries were “not intended
for use in cars”. Why then, did Tesla still use them? What effect
did the monopolistic ownership of lithium ion mining and
manufacturing resources by Tesla and Google investors have on the
decision to use lithium ion?- Is it not a fact that a majority of
your cars have been sold to your own investors or associates who act
as “fluffers” against any bad PR?
– In multiple
recorded interviews, Elon MUsk is on public record stating that, at
the time of application for the DOE loan Tesla was on the verge of
bankruptcy. The DOE loan was mandated under a Federal law known as
Section 136. This law stated that no car company could receive money
if itwas on the verge of bankruptcy. Past accountants of Tesla have
stated that Tesla was on the verge of bankruptcy at the time of the
loan application. Numerous Tesla staff and contractors have verified
this. Did Tesla commit a felony and acquire “unfair advantage”
per the GAO?
– Relative to the number of cars sold, why
has Tesla had so many Tesla drunk driver related crashes, deaths and
homicides. Why are Tesla drivers killing innocent pedestrians simply
because the Tesla’s “smell bad”.?
– Psychographic,
demographic and marketing studies have been published showing that
Tesla drivers have a higher-than-average inclination towards drugs,
strange sexual behavior and risk. Could this account for the number
of Tesla crashes and deaths?
– Is it true that safety
testing was done on Tesla cars without fully charged batteries and in
a moisture-locked environment because Tesla staff knew that fully
charged batteries and moisture in a crash WOULD cause a fiery
explosion, as they already have?
– Is it not a fact that
Google deletes, or hides any bad PR about Tesla on it’s network?
Would this be considered stock market manipulation in violation of
SEC laws?
– Numerous periodicals, including Valleywag,
document the fact that Elon Musk sends spy emails to his employees,
each with a few words changed in order to track them and see who
might reveal anything damaging to regulators?
– Who are
all of the property holders and lease-owners of the Tesla and
Solyndra, past and current, real-estate?
– According to
DOE staff, who were at DOE when the Tesla application was submitted,
nothing that Tesla submitted was ever built by Tesla. In fact, these
staff state that the vehicle that Tesla eventually sold was not even
designed or engineered when Tesla was approved for the loan
money,contrary to the Section 136 law requirement. They say that
Tesla took the money and THEN hired people to figure out what they
were going to do with it. As shown in the DOE files, the engineering
of the shipping Tesla cars has no element that was submitted to DOE.
Is that true?
– Elon Musks wives and founders have filed
lawsuits and made public statements that he is a fraud and coerced
them into participation. Is it proper fiduciary practice to allow Mr.
Musk to continue with the company?
– Why did Tesla not
have to pay the cash participation fee that the Section 136 law said
everybody had to pay? Tesla staff stated, at numerous documented
Silicon Valley open meetings that they got a “special applicant
participation waiver”. Why did Tesla get that waiver?
–
Did Tesla Motors provide falsified information in order to acquire
it’s Federal funding?
– Did Tesla Motors provide
falsified information in order to acquire it’s Federal waivers, tax
deferrals, credits and discounts?
– Kleiner Perkins and
certain silicon valley VC’s, all investors in a number of DOE
“winners” (including Tesla, Fisker, Solyndra, A123 and others),
organized meetings with a Dmitry Medvedev and other men known by the
State Department, CIA, FBI and federal investigators to be involved
inRussian mobsterism and then Ener1, Severstal and A123, dark-money
funded and run by billionaires (many of whom own lithium mining
interests) known by the State Department, the CIA and federal
investigators to be involved in Russian mobsterism, were awarded
taxpayer funds by Steven Chu, who was nominated by Kleiner Perkins.
Was any of this a conflict of interest?
– Why is the
only company to receive California State real estate exclusives,
exclusive tax waivers, credits and stock enhancers and free rides on
taxpayer backs also the same company who’s investors were the
largest funders of certain State officials?
– Federal
communications monitoring of text, voice and email communications of
certain highly placed Senators, lobbyists and venture capitalists
from 2005 to today should be made available to ALL federal criminal
investigators. Have they been? Are one or more Senators blocking this
effort because they are compromised?
– Why have so many
fraud lawsuits been filed against Elon Musk and Tesla Motors?
–
The head of the NHTSA (Strickland) Tesla investigation quit because
of increased scrutiny. The facts, such as these, demonstrate that
Tesla and Fisker never should have passed any NHTSA safety review.
How can the public be assured that ongoing NHTSA investigations
regarding Tesla willnot be rigged?- Did Tesla Motors provide
falsified information in order to acquire it’s State funding? Did
Tesla Motors provide falsified information in order to acquire it’s
State waivers, tax deferrals, credits and discounts? Did Tesla
investors bribe, or influence Congress people?
– Did
Tesla report tax credits as revenue/sales in stock reports in order
to trick investors into thinking Tesla was making profit that it was
actually not making?
– Did Tesla staff or owners
investors bribe, or influence Congress people? Did Tesla staff,
owners or investors provider misleading information to investors? Was
there a conflict of interest between Department of Energy staff and
Tesla owners, investors or staff? Was there a conflict of interest
between White House staff and Tesla owners, investors or staff? Was
there a conflict of interest between Senate staff and Tesla owners,
investors or staff? Did Tesla Motors use taxpayer money to hire
off-shore staff?
– Marketing sales staff from the ad
agencies for 60 Minutes, Consumer Reports, GQ, Fortune and other
mainstream periodicals have stated that Elon Musk purchased “puff
piece” stories about himself in those broadcasts and magazines and
that none of those stories were internally generated. Is it good
fiduciary practice for an executive to use corporate resources for
personal glorification?
– Did Tesla Motors use taxpayer
money to purchase supplies offshore that could have been purchased in
the United States? Did Tesla Motors participate in a market rigging
scam to rig lithium ion purchasing for its investors? Did Tesla
Motors participate in a market rigging scam to rig the electric car
market for its investors? Did Tesla Motors staff, or owners, sabotage
competitors?
– Did Tesla Motors staff, owners or
investors exchange campaign funding quid pro quo for business
financing?
– Did Silicon Valley companies, owned by
Tesla investors and campaign financiers, use internet technology to
falsify information to the public in order to manipulate stock market
perceptions in violation of SEC, RICO, and various other laws?
–
Did Tesla Motors lie about the safety metrics of its lithium ion
battery system?
– Was Tesla Motors holding safety metric
data in its files which differed fully from the safety metrics data
it provided to investors and NHTSA?
– Did Tesla Motors
violate securities law by using false information to acquire a
federal loan which it then used to falsify its stock metrics in order
to “pump” it’s stock?
– Did Deloitte accounting
firm conspire with Tesla to manipulate market metrics in violation of
RICO Statutes and did that firm manipulate Department of Energy
review data on Tesla’s behalf?
– A U.S. Senator
officiated at the opening of the Tesla NUMMI plant and lobbied for
Tesla’s tax waivers, credits, acquisition of NUMMI and discounts
and then that U.S. Senator had their staff work in Tesla’s offices.
Is it a conflict of interest that this senator received campaign
funding and this senator’s family received real estate deals from
the Tesla and, (next door to Tesla), Solyndra real estate deals?
–
Did Welles Fargo conspire with Tesla to manipulate market metrics in
violation of RICO Statutes?
– Did Goldman Sachs conspire
with Tesla to manipulate market metrics in violation of RICO
Statutes?
– Were Department of Energy staff manipulating
Tesla funding data in order to favor Tesla and it’s campaign
funding investors in violation of RICO Statutes?
– Were
Department of Energy staff manipulating Tesla funding data in order
to disfavor Tesla competitors and competitors to it’s campaign
funding investors in violation of RICO Statutes?
– Did
Tesla owners, staff or investors attempt to delay federal
investigations and indictments by asserting influence in violation of
RICO Statutes and numerous other laws?
– Documents show
there have been more Tesla fires that actually occurred than Tesla
has reported in the media. How many actual Tesla factory fires, test
car fires and Tesla battery fires have actually occurred?
–
Please provide an identification matrix showing campaign backers who
were lithium ion investors who had had their contacts exert influence
over NHTSA decisions regarding Tesla?
– The Secretary of
energy was friends with all of your investors. We have been unable to
find the name of even one person from OPM and Congressional
nomination file wrapper for Steven Chu’s nomination, who Chu did
not later give DOE $$ or perks to. Why is that?- The U.S. Post
Office, The TSA, The DOE, The GAO, Panasonic and over 100 of the
leading technical companies in the world say lithium ion batteries
can spontaneously explode. Why do you not disclose this to your
buyers in your literature?
– The Tesla can blow-up from
it’s charger and/or it’s batteries. Are there other dangers that
have also not been disclosed?
– Is Tesla operating in
violation of the patents of any other company?
– By Elon
Musk’s own admission, at the time of the DOE loan application all
of the car designs were $100,000.00, PER CAR, over budget and they
had no final design for a factory production run DFM. How could Tesla
have gotten the loan with the worst debt ratio, the least
engineering, thegreatest financial risk and the least collateral of
any applicant?
– Tesla lobbyists worked with Rahm
Emanuel in the White House, to arrange their loan deal. Rahm Emanuals
Senior Finance Aide was recently arrested for bribes, kickbacks,
corruption and money Laundering. Steve Rattner, The West Wing “Car
Czar”, who Tesla investors worked with to secure the Tesla loan,
was also indicted for corruption. Almost everyone at DOE involved in
your loan was forced to quit or fired. Does this call yourdealings
into question?
– Rolls-Royce Holdings said the U.K.’s
Serious Fraud Office has opened a formal investigation into bribery
and corruption of government officials for cars for the 1%.
Does this worry you?
– The NHTSA said that Elon Musk
lied about Fire Safety Review approval and who made the request for
recall and investigation. Should we trust Elon Musk?
–
Tesla got another $34 MILLION of our tax money in exclusive campaign
finance kickbacks for billionaires from the State of California. Why
did Tesla billionaires need a few million of our tax money in a
recession when people have no jobs?
– The German Tesla
“Safety Review” was exposed as “Sham” in that they conducted
no safety review and were just told to “pass the car” by your
bankers at Deutche Bank! Why did you not disclose that the German’s
conducted no testing of your battery system of any nature?
–
In Tesla’s own filed patent applications you state that your
batteries WILL explode spontaneously and kill and injure people and
burn down their homes. Why did you not disclose this in buyers
documentation?
– Tesla is MORE likely to catch on fire
than gasoline car”per Bloomberg & MIT. Why did you not disclose
this?
– Lithium Ion is “nearly impossible to
extinguish, and “acts like solid rocket fuel” say firefighters.
Tesla never supplied required battery company CO2 fire extinguishers
to car owners. Why not?
– Federal Investigators say you
are using “exploding flashlight batteries that were never intended
to be used in cars, in an improperly shielded box” to power the car
instead of commercial energy storage technology. They say your car
has “85% less lithium crash protection on the Tesla than ANY OTHER
ELECTRIC CAR”. All other companies had to recall EXCEPT Tesla. Why
not? What special leverage did you have?
– Over 150
defects and problems per model about the Tesla have been documented
on user-forums and in the press including: “Doors lock you in and
out. Bad if car on fire!”; “George Clooney Rips Tesla: ‘Why Am
I Always Stuck On The Side Of The F*cking Road?”; “Tesla
“Satisfaction” surveyauthored by it’s own investors/fanboys”;
“Tesla seat vibration causes Anal Itching!”; “VAMPIRE POWER
DEFECT slams entire Tesla Model S fleet!”; “Numerous defects
documented by owners online.” When the NUMMI factory was in use by
GM and Toyota only 5 defects per model car produced there occurred.
Now YOU produce a defect in EVERY car, Why?